<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Official Scalr blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.scalr.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.scalr.net</link>
	<description>treading the path to resourcing the world&#039;s applications</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:01:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on MySQL 5.1.41 Roles now available by Nir</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/mysql-5-1-41-roles-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-572</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=204#comment-572</guid>
		<description>Great. Thanks! This is much needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Thanks! This is much needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scalr.net Maintenance on August 26 at 1:00 AM PST by Bob Sutterfield</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/scalr-net-maintenance-on-august-26-at-100-am-pst/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Sutterfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 23:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=191#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Scalr roles are created with default security groups permitting global access (0.0.0.0/0) to these ports.  There&#039;s no need to add one specific address unless you also add the other specific addresses and turn off global access - which would be a very good thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scalr roles are created with default security groups permitting global access (0.0.0.0/0) to these ports.  There&#8217;s no need to add one specific address unless you also add the other specific addresses and turn off global access &#8211; which would be a very good thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Shared roles (CentOS) by admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/new-shared-roles-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 06:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=187#comment-562</guid>
		<description>CentOS 5.4 has only 5.0 in it&#039;s repos by default. We&#039;re working on new Shared roles based on Ubuntu 10.04 which has 5.1 mysql in their repo.

Regards,
Igor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CentOS 5.4 has only 5.0 in it&#8217;s repos by default. We&#8217;re working on new Shared roles based on Ubuntu 10.04 which has 5.1 mysql in their repo.</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Igor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Shared roles (CentOS) by Nir</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/new-shared-roles-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 05:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=187#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I must tell you I&#039;m a little bit disappointed. We&#039;re waiting for mysql 5.1 for current AMIs. I believe its what many Scalr users need and instead of upgrading current AMIs to 5.1 you release new AMIs with 5.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must tell you I&#8217;m a little bit disappointed. We&#8217;re waiting for mysql 5.1 for current AMIs. I believe its what many Scalr users need and instead of upgrading current AMIs to 5.1 you release new AMIs with 5.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scalr.net Maintenance on August 26 at 1:00 AM PST by Michael Taggart</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/scalr-net-maintenance-on-august-26-at-100-am-pst/comment-page-1/#comment-546</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Taggart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=191#comment-546</guid>
		<description>Great! Thank you Sebastian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thank you Sebastian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Shared roles (CentOS) by Igor Savchenko</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/new-shared-roles-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor Savchenko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=187#comment-539</guid>
		<description>5.4

Regards,
Igor</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>5.4</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Igor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Shared roles (CentOS) by Frederic Sidler</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/new-shared-roles-centos/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Frederic Sidler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=187#comment-538</guid>
		<description>Great. Which version of CentOS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great. Which version of CentOS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scalr.net Maintenance on August 26 at 1:00 AM PST by Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/scalr-net-maintenance-on-august-26-at-100-am-pst/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=191#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Yep. When the server is online, we&#039;ll announce the changes that security-conscious users will need to make to their security groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. When the server is online, we&#8217;ll announce the changes that security-conscious users will need to make to their security groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Introducing the Scalr Scheduler by Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/introducing-the-scalr-scheduler/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 05:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=128#comment-536</guid>
		<description>You simply schedule the job to be executed, and Scalr is in charge of finding an instance to execute the job on. If an instance has been terminated or simply is unresponsive, Scalr will ask another instance of the same Role to run it. Easy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You simply schedule the job to be executed, and Scalr is in charge of finding an instance to execute the job on. If an instance has been terminated or simply is unresponsive, Scalr will ask another instance of the same Role to run it. Easy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Scalr.net Maintenance on August 26 at 1:00 AM PST by Michael Taggart</title>
		<link>http://blog.scalr.net/announcements/scalr-net-maintenance-on-august-26-at-100-am-pst/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Taggart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.scalr.net/?p=191#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Does this mean that there will be a new ip address to allow for port 22 and udp 161-162 access? Or is this just a nameserver update?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this mean that there will be a new ip address to allow for port 22 and udp 161-162 access? Or is this just a nameserver update?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
